Data Governance Capacity
Data becomes something departments build on, not something nobody owns.
Definitions differ by department, ownership is unclear, and every new report starts with an argument about which number is correct.
Discuss this domainEvery report starts with a debate about the number.
Two departments report a different figure for the same measure and both are defensible.
No one is named as owner for the systems that hold your core records.
Classification exists on paper, so everything is handled as if it were public or secret.
Analytics projects stall in the first month on data quality nobody owns.
The data governance offering menu.
Offering 01 is the front door: it produces the evidence-based TruMaturity™ score and this domain’s maturity roadmap, which decides the order of everything below it. A fractional Chief Data Officer (vCDO) is available where the roadmap calls for a standing seat.
Related insights
All insights →Who Actually Owns the Data?
Poor data quality costs the average organization $12.9 million a year, according to Gartner. See why the owner-versus-custodian confusion is usually to blame.
Five Data Findings That Repeat in Every Audit
Poor data quality costs the average company $12.9M a year. See the five data findings that repeat in audit after audit and what actually fixes them.
Capacity underwrites the rest. Privacy, compliance, and AI governance all assume someone knows what data exists.