One governance maturity framework across six domains.
Every domain is scored on the same 1–5 scale. Domain scores average into one overall TruMaturity™ score, which sets the governance tier and drives the roadmap, the budget conversation, and board reporting.
Each question is answered against defined maturity anchors rather than a subjective rating.
Ten questions per domain, scored against documentation, interviews, and evidence.
Each domain carries equal weight, so a gain anywhere raises the same overall measure.
What each level means.
The work happens because a particular person cares about it. Nothing is documented, and nobody could repeat it without them.
Name an owner and write down what is already being done.
Some teams do it well, others not at all. Quality tracks the individual rather than the process.
Standardize on one documented practice with clear accountability.
There is a policy, an owner, and a process a new hire could follow. Practice matches the document.
Add measurement: a cadence, retained evidence, and a reported result.
The process runs on a schedule, produces evidence, and is reported to leadership in a consistent format.
Use the measurement to change the process, not only to report it.
Results feed back into design, and the domain is integrated with the other five rather than run beside them.
Hold the level through turnover and budget cycles.
The overall score sets the tier.
The tier is what shapes the engagement: what kind of work is worth doing next, and what would be premature.
What leadership receives.
A scorecard report produced from the assessment: overall score and tier, six domain scores, a governance heatmap, insights, priority domains, and a recommended roadmap with the services attached to it.
Scored against evidence, not self-report.
The assessment is conducted inside each domain’s Current State Assessment, so it can start in one domain and expand. Its scores are the baseline the roadmap, the budget conversation, and board reporting are measured against.
Full TruMaturity™ Assessment
Sixty questions, ten per domain, scored against documentation, stakeholder interviews, and control evidence. Conducted inside each domain's Current State Assessment and refreshed at each quarterly governance review.
The score decides what kind of work comes next.
Recommendations follow the overall score, then get sequenced against the individual domain scores and the pressure the organization is under.
Accelerator engagement
Establish ownership, a baseline, and a governance charter in the domain under the most pressure.
Baseline governance services
Current state assessment, governance framework and charter, and the core policy set in the weakest domains.
Operational integration services
Connect the domains so evidence, reporting, and review cadence are shared rather than duplicated.
Strategic transformation programs
Enterprise governance architecture, quantified risk, and measurement that feeds decisions rather than reports.